Debate

The McDonalds Scalding Coffee Case is a case for compensatory and punitive damages filed by a 79-year-old woman, Stella Liebeck, who suffered from third degree burns as a ending of spilled McDonalds coffee on her body. The jury awarded Liebeck with $200,000 in compensatory damages and $2.7 million in punitive damages. These amounts were later reduced, but the general conclusion is that McDonalds was seriously penalize for serving very hot coffee that led to serious injury.McDonalds coffee is scalding because it is maintained at 180 to 190 degrees Fahrenheit to maintain best taste. The temperature of McDonalds is glaringly high comp bed to the normal temperature of coffee when prepared at home, which is only about 135 to 140 degrees Fahrenheit. Despite this fact, the case is worth revisiting because on that point are certain arguments worth pursuing, which could lessen or remove entirely the liability of McDonalds.It should be remembered that coffee should naturally be served hot , unless the customer asked for other types of coffee, which should be served cold. Therefore, man companies such as McDonalds defend certain responsibilities to their consumers, the latter also have responsibility to their own selves, particularly in ensuring that they would exercise coating in their handling or consumption of purchased food. In the case described above, it is clear that Liebeck did not exercise due diligence in her handling of the coffee.With practiced companionship that the coffee was hot, she placed the Styrofoam transfuse containing the coffee between her knees. She should have exercised more prudence considering that she was sitting in a car and she placed the cup between her knees, both circumstances contributing to the lack of stability to the cup. Moreover, Liebeck did not consider that she was already old and her body is no longer in cap shape. She should have exercised more care in her actions to prevent any kind of injury.ReferencesAmerican Associ ation for Justice. McDonalds Scalding Coffee Case. Retrieved February 5, 2008 Lectric Law Library. The Actual Facts About The McDonalds Coffee Case. Retrieved February 5, 2008, from http//www.lectlaw.com/files/cur78.htm dealThe McDonalds Scalding Coffee Case is a case for compensatory and punitive damages filed by a 79-year-old woman, Stella Liebeck, who suffered from third degree burns as a result of spilled McDonalds coffee on her body. The jury awarded Liebeck with $200,000 in compensatory damages and $2.7 million in punitive damages. These amounts were later reduced, but the general conclusion is that McDonalds was severely punished for serving very hot coffee that led to serious injury.McDonalds coffee is scalding because it is maintained at 180 to 190 degrees Fahrenheit to maintain optimum taste. The temperature of McDonalds is glaringly high compared to the normal temperature of coffee when prepared at home, which is only about 135 to 140 degrees Fahrenheit. Despite this fact , the case is worth revisiting because there are certain arguments worth pursuing, which could lessen or remove entirely the liability of McDonalds.It should be remembered that coffee should naturally be served hot, unless the customer asked for other types of coffee, which should be served cold. Therefore, while companies such as McDonalds have certain responsibilities to their consumers, the latter also have responsibility to their own selves, particularly in ensuring that they would exercise diligence in their handling or consumption of purchased food. In the case described above, it is clear that Liebeck did not exercise due diligence in her handling of the coffee.With full knowledge that the coffee was hot, she placed the Styrofoam cup containing the coffee between her knees. She should have exercised more prudence considering that she was sitting in a car and she placed the cup between her knees, both circumstances contributing to the lack of stability to the cup. Moreover, Li ebeck did not consider that she was already old and her body is no longer in top shape. She should have exercised more care in her actions to prevent any kind of injury.ReferencesAmerican Association for Justice. McDonalds Scalding Coffee Case. Retrieved February 5, 2008 Lectric Law Library. The Actual Facts About The McDonalds Coffee Case. Retrieved February 5, 2008, from http//www.lectlaw.com/files/cur78.htm